Tuesday, July 9, 2013

Best Picks List 2013: Oasis Petroleum (NYSE: OAS) - A Bakken Shale Revolution

Introduction

After doing nothing much for the entire 2012 (only +4.2%), Oasis Petroleum (NYSE: OAS) is up over +32% YTD (till 07/09/2013) in 2013. This is a name which I have closely followed for the last couple of years and I am quite bullish on the prospects for this company in the long-term. This is also a holding in my Best Picks 2013 Model Portfolio which I am tracking from 01/01/2013 for 2013. I normally add to my position when there is a pullback to any of my preferred technical levels in an up-trend market. Additionally I trim my positions based on technical levels (e.g. high RSI) or when there is excess exuberance in the markets.

Region

OAS primarily operates as an Exploration and Production (E&P) company in the Williston Basin of Montana and North Dakota in the Bakken and Three Forks formation. Over the course of last few years production growth has increased by leaps and bounds in this region as more and more places are discovered from where shale oil can be drilled with ease using modern day hydraulic-fracturing techniques.

Financials & Growth Trajectory - Q1 2013 Summary Results

Q1 ended March 2013 oil production was 2482 MBbls compared to 1474 MBbls for Q1 ended March 2012, i.e. a growth of 68.4%. In terms of Oil equivalents the numbers were 2714 MBoe at the end of Q1 March 2013 compared to 1605 MBoe at the end of Q1 March 2012, i.e. a growth of 69.1%.

Oil related revenues grew to $231,675 (thousands) at the end of Q1 2013 compared to 131,376 at the end of Q1 2012, i.e. a growth of 76%. Average daily production increased to 30,153 Boe (barrels of oil equivalent) per day at the end of Q1 2013 from 17,633 Boe per day at the end of Q1 2012, i.e. a growth of  71%. Average oil sale prices increased to $93.33 per Bbl (without derivatives) in Q1 2013 from $88.10 per Bbl in Q1 2012, i.e. higher by 6% and contributes towards higher realized oil related revenues.

This amazing high growth numbers across all different data, points to the fact that OAS is still growing and at a rapid pace.

Financials & Growth Trajectory - FY 2012 Summary Results


Merger & Acquisition Opportunity

Market capitalization of OAS is around $3.9B, with around $1.2B in long-term debt. This puts OAS into a sweet-spot where any of the US based oil and gas giants [e.g. Anadarko Petroleum (APC), Apache Corp (APA), etc.] without a presence in the Williston Basin can easily gobble up OAS. At the same time OAS can be a target for any of the Canadian oil and gas company or for example if any of the Chinese or Korean oil and gas companies like to expand their presence in US for their domestic needs. There has been M&A by Chinese and Korean companies buying up US based and Canada based E&P companies assets. 
Bakken shale has attracted a lot of attention because of the huge shale oil contents of the region. Couple of previous M&A of companies in the region included Brigham Exploration Company (NASDAQ: BEXP) which was acquired by Statoil of Norway. Similarly GeoResources Inc. (NASDAQ: GEOI) was acquired by Halcon Resources. 

Downside Risks

Following are some of the downside risks to this high octane growth story:
  • Slowdown of global economy which causes WTI (West Texas Intermediate - US crude oil benchmark) crude prices to fall thus affecting revenue realized for OAS. 
  • Assumption and reliance on the net proved and developed reserves estimates data provided by the independent reserve engineers. 
  • OAS can successfully and economically extract the oil from the prepared and drilled wells

Thursday, June 27, 2013

Shale Revolution in the United States

This article is to be published by the Boston College Finance Magazine - 2013 Edition

by Debashis Das (MSF-2014) , Tracy To (MSF-2014)

Introduction

The United States is sitting on a large amount of oil and natural gas reserves. These reserves have been further increased by the newly-discovered Bakken Shale and the Utica Shale formations. Coupled with the new technology of horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing (also known as ‘fracking’), this opens up new potential for companies in this this industry and for the country. The supply glut has helped push natural gas prices down which is beneficial for a host of secondary industries, including electric power generation utilities, chemical companies, steel companies, etc. The shale revolution in the U.S. is creating many jobs in places like North Dakota, where due to the Bakken Shale formation, the unemployment rate is lower than average for the rest of the country. This article looks at the different shale regions, how natural gas is extracted from the shale formations, what drives the price of natural gas, i.e. the different aspects of supply and demand and also the environmental aspects of horizontal drilling. 

US Shale Regions

The major oil and gas shale formations in the continental US includes: Bakken Shale, Barnett Shale, Eagle Ford Shale, Haynesville Shale, Marcellus Shale, and the Utica Shale formations. The Bakken Shale formation, located in Montana and North Dakota, is estimated to hold 4.3 billion barrels of oil and is the largest oil find in U.S. history. The estimates may grow as more companies drill and find oil in that region. The formation ranges in depth from 4500 – 7500 feet with an average thickness of 22 feet. In 2009 Bakken Shale in North Dakota produced 80 million barrels of oil making it the fourth largest oil producing state after Texas, California and Alaska.
In Texas, Barnett Shale, the nation’s most developed shale gas play, is estimated to hold 43.4 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) of natural gas and has already produced more than 4.8 Tcf. It stretches across 6500 square miles and its natural gas reserves are enough to power all of Texas’s homes for almost 200 years. Also in Texas, the Eagle Ford Shale formation which did not become productive until 2008 has an estimated 21 Tcf of natural gas and 3.35 billion barrels of oil reserves. This shale formation ranges in depth from 5700 to around 10,200 feet and covers around 3000 square miles.
Surpassing the Barnett Shale formation, the Haynesville Shale gas formation located in western Louisiana, east Texas, and south-western Arkansas has an estimated 74.7 Tcf of shale gas reserves and ranges between 10,500 and 13,500 feet in depth. The area encompasses more than 9000 square miles, is about 200 to 300 feet thick and is considered to be the second largest natural gas shale formation in the United States.
The Marcellus shale formation, stretching across 5 States (New York, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio and Maryland), is estimated to contain 410 Tcf of shale gas. The total area is around 95,000 square miles and the depth is from 4000 to 8000 feet. The thick organic-rich shale intervals are concentrated in the northeastern Pennsylvania, coincident with where the highest leasing activities are.[1] The Utica Shale formation, a relatively new shale discovery is located few thousand feet below the Marcellus shale. Utica Shale, believed to be larger and thicker than Marcellus based on the early testing results, is still under evaluation. Much of the exploration in the Utica Shale formation is occurring in eastern Ohio where this shale formation is closest to the ground. It is estimated to hold more than 15 Tcf of natural gas and 5.5 billion barrels of oil as per Ohio Geological Survey.

Shale Gas – Extraction Process

 Today, hydraulic fracturing is used extensively for shale oil and gas extraction and use a combination of water, oil, sand, and chemicals as a fluid through concentric steel tubes to create fractures in the rock. The fluids most commonly used in the hydraulic fracturing process are water, sand and chemical additives, which include sodium chloride (table salt), ethylene glycol (present in household cleaners), borate salts (used in cosmetics), sodium/potassium carbonate (used in detergent), guar gum (used in ice-cream) and isopropanol (used in deodorant).[2] The hydraulic fracturing fluid is injected into the well at very high pressure to open cracks into the shale rocks. The sand remains in the fractures, holding the fissures open and allowing the oil and gas to flow into the well, along with the fluids. Figure 1 illustrates the process of hydraulic fracturing or ‘fracking’.[3] With hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling, much shale resource once considered inaccessible has becomes available. Additionally horizontal drilling has drastically reduced the footprints the exploration and production (E&P) company’s leave on the surface with the drilling pad site is much reduced.
Natural gas (primarily methane) extracted from a well has liquefiable hydrocarbons (e.g. propane, butane, etc.) as well as other contaminant gases (carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, etc.) and is referred to as ‘wet natural gas’. Natural gas from which these components of liquefiable components and contaminants are removed is referred to as ‘dry natural gas’. This separation is done at a natural gas processing plant close to where the gas is extracted. This dry natural gas is consumer grade and sent through pipelines for distribution to consumers or for liquefaction for export purposes.
Figure 1. Hydraulic Fracturing Process

Natural Gas – Supply, Demand & Price Stability

Natural gas prices hit a bottom of around $1.90/MMBtu (per million British thermal units) in April 2012 from a high of around $14/MMBtu during the commodities boom of 2007 – 2008. There are a few reasons for this price fluctuation including the state of the economy, supply and demand scenario, variations in weather patterns in winter and summer, imports, severe weather conditions (e.g. hurricanes which are normal and hits the Gulf coast, often leads to shutdown of production facilities), storage capacity, alternate fuel usage and industrial and consumer demands.
A common measure of the long-term viability of U.S. domestic crude oil and natural gas is the remaining technically recoverable resource, also called remaining TRR. Estimates of TRR are often not certain, specifically for the new sites where few wells have been drilled. The remaining TRR consists of ‘proved reserves’ and ‘unproved resources.’ Proved reserves of crude oil and natural gas are the estimated volumes which are expected to be produced with certainty under existing economic and operating conditions. Unproved resources are additional volumes expected to be produced without consideration of economics or operating condition. As wells are drilled, unproved resources become proved reserves and ultimately contribute to the production figures. Estimates of unproved resources can change significantly as more is learned about the fields where drilling continues. The unproved reserved has dropped to 482 Tcf in the Annual Energy Outlook 2012 report (as of 1/1/2010) from 827 Tcf as of 1/1/2009.[4] Nevertheless, the proved reserves of U.S. wet natural gas at December 31, 2010 increased to 318 Tcf from 284 Tcf at December 31, 2009, a 11.9 % increase.[5] The Energy Information Administration (EIA) expects that natural gas consumption in the U.S. will average around 70 Bcf/d in both 2013 and 2014. Closer to average temperatures in 2013 and similar forecasts for 2014 (compared to record-warm temperatures in 2012) have led to higher than average usage of natural gas for commercial and residential heating.
U.S. Dry Natural Gas Production totaled 24.05 Tcf following 22.9 Tcf in 2011,[6] an increase of 5.0% in 2012, 7.8% in 2011, 3.4% in 2010 and 2.3% in 2009 year-on-year as shown in Figure 2. Figure 2 also shows the record production levels achieved in 2011 and in 2012 surpassing the previous record production levels from the early 1970’s. The increase in production is attributed to various factors, including more cost-efficient drilling techniques such as horizontal drilling, which have resulted in an increased output from the shale formations. In the long run increase in supply will push prices down and will deter exploration and production companies to increase their drilling acreage. This will reduce the gas output thereby decreasing production and hence maintain the equilibrium between supply and demand. 

Figure 2. U.S. Dry Natural Gas Production historical data (1930 – 2013)
It is surprising, but true that although U.S. is awash with natural gas through its various shale formations, the country still imports natural gas for its domestic usage through pipelines primarily from Canada and Mexico and also as LNG (liquefied natural gas) from Africa, the Caribbean, and the Middle-East. Imports increased from the mid-80s to around 2007. Since that time, imports have decreased due to various factors, including a weak economy, high storage levels, and increasing production here in the U.S as shown in Figure 3.[7]
Economic growth can fuel consumption of natural gas and hence positively affect the demand and support higher prices. Higher demand exists from industrial and commercial sectors during times of strength in the economy. Steel plants use natural gas as their plant fuel and similarly, companies in the chemical sector [e.g. Dow Chemical (NYSE:DOW) or Lyondell Basell (NYSE:LYB)] and fertilizer companies use natural gas as their raw feedstock. Economic downturns, as well as the cyclical nature of these industries, can have a negative effect on demand.

Figure 3. U.S. Natural Gas Imports historical data (1970 – 2013)
Natural gas in underground storage fields also plays a critical role in the supply and demand equation and helps maintain the price equilibrium. During sudden demand spike situations, either due to weather conditions (hot or cold) or pipeline outage issues, reserves are released to meet the additional needs in the market and thus support price stability. Natural gas levels in storage typically increase from April – October and decrease during the heating season from November – March. This ‘saw-tooth’ pattern repeats every year and is shown in Figure 4.[8]
Prices of other alternative fuels also have an effect on natural gas prices specifically that of crude oil and coal. Between the EPA coming down hard on the usage of coal and strict emission standards in power plants, there has been a push to move into the cleaner, natural-gas-based electricity generation. This trend has been helped by lower natural gas prices and higher supply, thus creating demand.

Figure 4. Lower 48 states Natural gas Working Underground Storage historical data (1994 – 2013)
Higher crude oil prices will tend to move some of the demand over to natural gas. An example of this is 18 wheeler trucks, which could run on natural gas and not only save on diesel fuel costs as compared to the cheap natural gas, but also pollute the atmosphere less. T. Boone Pickens (hedge fund investor) has been pushing for government subsidies in the trucking sector for years but this has yet to be passed, although it is gaining support from the president and politicians from both parties. Clean Energy Fuels Corp (NASDAQ: CLNE), which is majority owned by T. Boone Pickens, has been installing natural gas stations for refueling purposes. More and more companies like United Parcel Service, Inc. (NYSE:UPS) and others have started adopting natural gas based vehicles, although the number is not large currently.  

Export & Import Landscape

Cheniere Energy (NYSE: LNG) is the first company to get approval from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (‘FERC’) for the construction and operation of a facility which would liquefy and export domestically produced natural gas from the Sabine Pass LNG (owned 100% by Cheniere) terminal located in Louisiana. The Sabine Pass terminal has regasification and send-out capacity of 4.0 billion cubic feet per day (bcf/d) and storage capacity of 16.9 billion cubic feet equivalent. This approval would help to add even more capacity to the current Sabine Pass LNG terminal. Cheniere has also entered into a long-term contract for sale of LNG on the order of 16.0 mtpa (million tons per annum) to the following: BG Gulf Coast LNG (5.5 mtpa), Gas Natural Fenosa (3.5 mtpa), Korea Gas Corp (3.5 mtpa) and GAIL India Ltd. (3.5 mtpa).[9] Earlier in 2012, Cheniere entered into a contract with Blackstone Capital Partners, an affiliate of the popular private equity firm The Blackstone Group, whereby Blackstone Capital Partners agreed to fund the equity needed for the expansion of the Sabine Pass LNG terminal project, highlighting the importance of this project to the investment community. Net imports (imports minus exports) have been falling and are at its lowest level since 1992 as shown in Figure 5,[10] which is good for the overall U.S. economy as it becomes less dependent on foreign reserves of natural gas.

Figure 5. U.S. annual average natural gas net imports (1973 – 2011)

Environmental Aspects of Shale Gas Drilling

Although natural gas is a relatively clean energy which, in use, releases fewer emissions than does coal or oil, its production process can create environmental impact if proper precautions are not employed. Among all, the potential of water impact is the most concerned. As the hydraulic fracturing process uses large volumes of water, which later results in waste water, there can be impacts on drinking water resources and aquatic ecosystems. As mentioned earlier, hydraulic fracturing fluids consist of water, oil, sand, and chemicals. In case of spills or leaks from the storage on site where the fluid is placed before injection, or through the injection well, surface water and underground aquifers may be contaminated on contact with the fluids. Once the fracturing is completed, the hydraulic fracturing waste water is withdrawn and returned to the surface. In addition to the fracturing fluid, the flow back fluid can contain natural gas, high levels of total dissolved solids (chemicals), metals, and naturally occurring radioactive materials.[11] Typically, this waste water is recycled for use in fracturing fluid, transported to treatment facilities, or disposed of by injection into deep wells. The environment impact would be severe should the waste water be improperly handled and discharged to surface soil or water during storage for reuse, transportation to treatment plants or disposal into wells.  Besides, historical cases suggest that waste water injection into deep wells induces earthquakes, and that there is a correlation between the magnitude of the largest earthquake and the total volume of waste water injection.
While FracFocus, the national hydraulic fracturing chemical registry, discloses chemicals that are used in hydraulic fracturing, and also provides public access to the official state chemical disclosure for 10 states,[12] a report highlights that energy companies didn’t report thousands of their oil and natural gas wells as having been hydraulically fractured on FracFocus.org.”[13]Air quality is also impacted near natural gas production areas. Emission of a high volume of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) and methane are associated with the waste water returning to the surface.

Conclusion

Shale oil and gas production in U.S. has risen to record levels over the last few years due to improvements in drilling technology. Due to the abundance in supply from the existing and the recently discovered shale formations, improvement in drilling techniques and technologies, stalled economic activity and various other reasons including seasonal change in demands, prices have fallen drastically from their 2007-2008 highs, although lately it has risen back up from the lows of April 2012 when the price fell below $2/MMBtu. Lower natural gas prices are a boon for some of the industries, including chemical, steel, fertilizer and power generation utility companies. Exploration and Production companies drilling for natural gas, need to ensure proper precaution when horizontal drilling for oil and gas in the shale regions, to avoid water contamination. The current shale reserve estimates are good enough to support the needs of the U.S. for many years to come and is prompting companies to export natural gas globally to other places where because of less supply it demands higher prices, e.g. China, Japan and other places in Asia. Politicians in this country should take a closer look and take necessary steps to ensure that the U.S. can reap the full benefits of what exists in abundance naturally, including passing laws to promote liquefied natural gas export and opening up areas where natural gas can be used easily. This would help the U.S. to boost employment thereby reducing unemployment rate as companies drill more natural gas which finds usage in different industries within this country and outside globally as well.

 Notes



[1] Marcellus Shale – Appalachian Basin Natural Gas Play: http://geology.com/articles/marcellus-shale.shtml (accessed April 06, 2013)
[2] Understanding Fracturing Fluid: http://www.energyfromshale.org/hydraulic-fracturing/hydraulic-fracturing-fluid (accessed March 31, 2013)
[3] What Is Hydraulic Fracturing?: http://www.propublica.org/special/hydraulic-fracturing-national (accessed March 31, 2013)
[4] U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), Annual Energy Outlook 2012: http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/pdf/0383(2012).pdf , 57 (accessed March 31, 2013)
[5] U.S. Crude Oil, Natural Gas, and NG Liquids Proved Reserves: http://www.eia.gov/naturalgas/crudeoilreserves/index.cfm (accessed March 31, 2013)
[6] U.S. Dry Natural Gas Production data: http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/hist/n9070us2A.htm (accessed March 31, 2013)
[7] U.S. Natural Gas Imports: http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/hist/n9100us2a.htm (accessed March 31, 2013)
[8] Lower 48 States Natural Gas Working Underground Storage: http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/hist/nw_epg0_sao_r48_bcfw.htm (accessed March 31, 2013)
[9] FERC Approves the Sabine Pass Liquefaction Project: http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=101667&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1683624&highlight= (accessed March 31, 2013)
[10]U.S. natural gas net imports at lowest levels since 1992:  http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=5410 (accessed March 31, 2013)
[11] Natural Gas Extraction – Hydraulic Fracturing: http://www2.epa.gov/hydraulicfracturing#wastewater (accessed April 06, 2013)
[12] Frac Focus Chemical Disclosure Registry: http://fracfocus.org/welcome
[13] Benjamin Haas, Jim Polson, Phil Kuntz & Ben Elgin, “Fracking Hazards Obscured in Failure to Disclose Wells”, August 14, 2012: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-08-14/fracking-hazards-obscured-in-failure-to-disclose-wells.html (accessed April 06, 2013)

Wednesday, April 10, 2013

Case for Macy's (NYSE: M) vs JC Penney (NYSE: JCP)


JC Penney's CEO Ron Johnson (ex Apple Retail chief) was finally ousted after he failed miserably to turn around the company and Myron Ullman (the previous CEO) was brought in as the new CEO this week. This case is also interesting because of the involvement of the legendary hedge fund manager Bill Ackman of Pershing Square Capital Management which has a large position in JCP. Last 1 year return for JC Penney (NYSE: JCP) is -60% and every Tom, Dick & Harry from the ‘street’ has made money shorting JCP since it was obvious over a period of time that the turnaround strategy for JCP including removal of the coupon-ing, flat prices, store within a store and the free 'haircuts' was not working as JCP was losing millions quarter after quarter. Even the latest same store sales results for JCP came in at a miserable -10%.

In the mean time Macy's Inc. (NYSE:M) has been having a tremendous performance with an amazing execution under the leadership of the current CEO Terry Lundgren and clearly demonstrated through its fabulous same store sales numbers where it has been beating its own estimates month after month. This is also reflected in its EPS numbers for the last couple of years for every quarter where it has been consistently beating the street estimates and hit a fresh 52 week high today 04/10/2013 of $44.95. JC Penney's pain has been Macy's gain since Macy's has been able to attract some of the traffic from JC Penney into its stores. If you have played both these names from a 'pair-trade' (Long 'M', Short 'JCP') perspective for the last year you have made a lot of money. Additionally Macy's is incredibly cheap compared to any other retailer out there in terms of forward PE basis and has more room to run.

As things stands right now, maybe only a private equity LBO deal or some drastic change in strategy may change the fate for JCP, otherwise we are heading more south in this US based retailer.

Thursday, March 28, 2013

EU Financial Crisis - Cyprus Saved, But Who's Next

Cyprus Averts Default

Last Updated: 03/24/2013 - The turmoil in Cyprus seems to have reached temporary relief (at least for the time being) with the EU finance ministers, ECB and IMF reaching an accord today with the Cypriot government and agreeing to provide the €10 billion loans to save the country from default. The second largest bank in Cyprus (Cyprus Popular Bank, or Laiki) is going to be shut down with the fate of accounts with deposits over €100,000 unknown. 

Deposits over €100,000 are not insured, similar to $250,000 limit by FDIC in US. Hence these account holders are going to take a big 'haircut', most of which are probably of Russian corporations and personnel. 

Also interesting is the concept of the 'good' bank and the 'bad' bank setup similar to what happened with Citigroup with the creation of Citi Holdings just after US financial crisis in 2008 - 2009 and as we know Citi Holdings is still getting hit on those bad mortgage loans.

After Cyprus, Who's next to shake the Global Markets

Last Updated: 03/28/2013 - We have been able to avoid a sovereign default and a messy exit from the EU by the tiny Cyprus, but attention is shifting towards who's next in the EU to go through similar phase and bring down the global markets down to its knees. 

Global equity markets have shrugged off latest financial turmoil in the EU due to Cyprus but any financial instability at any of the bigger EU countries like Italy or Spain can bring those memories of summer of 2011 and 2012 back, in the blink of an eye.


S&P 500 closed on 03/28/2013 at 1569.19 with a YTD and Q1 2013 gain of a fantastic 10%, its highest closing since October 9, 2007. Dow followed closely with a gain of ~11.3% YTD and Q1 2013. The question now is what's next for the major indices, which have seen one of the most 'hated' rallies, with hardly any major pullbacks. Investors should keep a close eye at EU, since around similar time last couple of years we have seen huge pullbacks driven by incidents out of EU. Although the major sell side houses have been calling for above 1600 year end closing for the S&P 500, I think we are going lower before we go higher from here. 


On the EU front there are lot of things boiling currently in Greece, Italy, Cyprus and elsewhere. One EU country's name which has come up and seems financially weak is Slovenia whose borrowing rates crossed 7%, similar levels which prompted ECB to take 'whatever action necessary' promise for Greece, Spain and Italy last year. CDS spread for Slovenia jumped up 123 bps to 405 bps according to Markit data. Slovenia has bond maturing in early June and it will be very interesting to see how it plays out. Slovenia's bank assets are around 135% of GDP compared to around 800% for Cyprus. For now all eyes should be focus on EU and on North Korea to see how development there affects the global equity markets which so far this year has withstood all financial turmoil.