Tuesday, December 31, 2013

Best Picks 2013 - How did I do?

Best Picks List 2013 

The figure below shows the list of holdings from my model portfolio which I managed actively (well almost, given the fact that I am a part time student with a full time job and which is not asset management!) throughout 2013. Some commentary on individual names from my holdings:
  • Cheniere Energy (ticker: LNG) has been a huge winner in 2013 (+130%) for me and I am continue long the stock heading into 2014, since I think it has a big early mover advantage in the transportation of natural gas from the shale rich gas deposits of U.S. (southern Louisiana) to other parts of the world where natural gas sells for much higher price (higher demand) as compared to that of continental U.S. with a much lower price thus presenting a well economical benefit.
  • Michael Kors (ticker: KORS) is another name which I have been very bullish throughout the year and continue to be into 2014. Any major weakness in the market would be a reason to accumulate this name which returned +60% in 2013. As we know KORS has been luring consumers away from Coach Inc. (ticker: COH) with its stylish accessories and handbags and I think KORS is not done yet.
  • Continental Resources (ticker: CLR) and Oasis Petroleum (ticker: OAS) are two Bakken Shale names which I have been very bullish about and they returned handsomely as well in 2013 with CLR around +59% and OAS around +55% return. Earlier this year OAS made an interesting acquisition of oil properties in the Williston Basin which is going to further bolster and improve its position in the region. Valuation wise as well, I see OAS around $60 based on future growth prospects and hence continue to be long this name in 2014. I also see OAS as a speculative M&A play with any of the 'big' U.S. based on Asian (Chinese or Korean) or other global oil players (Royal Dutch Shell, Statoil, etc.) trying to buy this valuable Bakken shale asset. I have closed my positions in CLR just before the close of the year.
  • Pfizer Inc. (ticker: PFE) returned around +26% in 2013 under-performing S&P 500, but I still like this name given the current pipeline and the recent FDA approval of Xalkori. Also diversification of non core assets (e.g. Zoetis, Inc.) had helped the company to streamline its core business. 
  • Cornerstone OnDemand (ticker: CSOD) - I offloaded this name after around +60% return earlier this year and planning to re-enter given a broad market weakness. This is the only survivor in the cloud software-as-a-service (SaaS) talent and human resource management space including recruiting, employee performance and learning. Other names in this space including Taleo (ticker: TLEO), Success Factors (ticker: SFSF) and Kenexa (ticker: KNXA) has earlier been acquired by Oracle, SAP and IBM respectively. 
  • Allot Communications (ticker: ALLT) and Fusion IO (ticker: FIO) were bad calls on my part which I closed after couple of months of being long. 

Figure A: Best Picks List 2013 - Performance of all holdings

Figure B: Best Picks List 2013 - From my tracking software


Thursday, October 3, 2013

Best Picks List 2013 - My Holdings (Part 3)

How Am I Doing

My model portfolio is up 26.8% YTD (non risk adjusted) in 2013. Note that I started this portfolio with stocks bought on 01/01/2013. During the same time-frame, S&P 500 has managed 17.7% return (YTD). My current portfolio with 20 stocks right now has outperformed the S&P 500 YTD by 9.1% YTD (910 bps as of 10/03/2013)!

Here are my top 4 performers this year YTD: Cheniere Energy (LNG), ServiceNow (NOW), Cornerstone OnDemand (CSOD) and Under Armor (UA), all averaging around 70% YTD.

Below is a snapshot from the software which I use to track my portfolio holdings & returns and shows the performance of my holdings against S&P 500 on 1-day, 1-week, 1-month and YTD basis.

Thursday, July 25, 2013

China - No Hard Landing - Part 2

 Introduction

Following my article from earlier this year,[1] on whether there exists a possibility of 'Hard Landing' in China, in this very brief article I revisit the conditions and reassess the current situation in China based on some of the latest economic data points out of the PRC (People's Republic of China) released by National Bureau of Statistics, China.

GDP Growth and PMI Data

There has been a significant deterioration in the economic conditions in China as evident from the latest set of data points. China’s GDP growth for the second quarter slowed to 7.5% and down from 7.7% in the first quarter. Although 7.5% is the target set by the government this will be the first year with the slowest growth since 1990.


Figure 1. China GDP growth, Source: Wall Street Journal[2]

 Another important metric – HSBC China Manufacturing PMI also shows continuous deterioration during the last couple of months.  HSBC PMI data recorded a value of 48.2 in June and down from 49.2 in May. A reading below 50 indicates contraction. The latest HSBC Flash China Manufacturing PMI for July shows follow-through down of the earlier contraction in the PMI number from June (48.2) with a value of 47.7 for July which is at 11-month low. The PMI numbers are depicted in Figure 2 and Figure 3. The figure shows clear downtrend of the manufacturing conditions and hence economic scenario and would help investors to stay away from China for the time being unless the situation improves.


Figure 2. HSBC China Manufacturing PMI (June 2013), Source: Markit [3]


Figure 3. HSBC China Flash Manufacturing PMI (July 2013), Source: Markit [4]

Retail Sales

The aim of the current government is to spur economic growth through domestic consumption but retails sales have not been impressive and not helping as well towards that purpose. A look at the latest retail sales figure shows that retail sales was up 13.3% in June and 12.9% in May 12.7% for the first half of the year compared to 14.3% for the first half of 2012.


Figure 4. Auto and Retail Sales, Source: Wall Street Journal[5]

Conclusion

            Looking at the current economic data points including GDP growth, PMI numbers, etc. investors should be wary of the current economic scenario in China and wait for further improvements before taking up any decision on investments in China. At the same time I believe the GDP contraction will continue below 7.5% and the government may have to bring the lower level of the forecast down few notches to match the actual GDP numbers for the quarters ahead. Although there may not be an immediate threat to ‘Hard Landing’ (GDP growth below 5%) as I have stated in my earlier article and the government will intervene with easy monetary policy and economic (including infrastructure) stimulus, with the current economic scenario the government proposed GDP growth targets looks aggressive and needs to be revised.

 Notes


[1] Debashis Das, “China - No Hard Landing (Rise of the Dragon)”, Mar 07, 2013, http://debashisdasiitk.blogspot.com/2013/07/china-no-hard-landing-rise-of-dragon.html
[2] Tom Orlik, “China’s Slowing Economy, An illustrated Guide”, July 15, 2013, http://blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2013/07/15/chinas-slowing-economy-an-illustrated-guide/
[5] Tom Orlik, “China’s Slowing Economy, An illustrated Guide”, July 15, 2013, http://blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2013/07/15/chinas-slowing-economy-an-illustrated-guide/

Tuesday, July 16, 2013

China - No Hard Landing (Rise of the Dragon)

This article is to be published by the Boston College Finance Magazine - 2013 Edition

Originally Dated: Mar 07, 2013 by Debashis Das

Introduction

After falling for more than two years, China’s economic growth picked up steam to register a GDP growth of 7.9 percent in quarter four 2012, compared to a year earlier. HSBC Markit Purchasing Managers Index (PMI), a widely followed and important China macroeconomic metric, registered better-than-expected values for both December 2012 and January 2013. Other indicators, including higher electricity consumption, steel production and demand for crude oil, support this uptrend in China’s economy. China is the world’s biggest consumer of iron-ore and copper, and its rising prices in the world market suggests a strengthening Chinese economy. The global macro environment continues to struggle with the European Union (EU) going through near recessionary conditions and the United States registering a barely 1.5-2 percent annual growth rate. U.S. GDP had a contraction of 0.1 percent in Q4 2012 based on preliminary Q4 GDP data from end of January 2013, which was then revised up by 0.1 percent growth for Q4 2012 based on data from end of Feb 2013. The BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India and China) emerging market countries are struggling to live up to their expectations of either double-digit or high-single-digit growth but based on the macroeconomic data from the last couple of months it seems that China has turned the corner and is trying to make a comeback. Economists and analysts who planned to write off China earlier and declared a ‘hard landing’ (a substantial slowdown in economic growth) at the PRC (People’s Republic of China) should take a closer look at the recent economic data out of the country and rethink their strategy.
The economic data and numbers referenced in this article are from the same sources (primarily the People’s Bank of China and the National Bureau of Statistics of China) which are referenced by the financial world. Also it needs to be noted that some of the economic data around Jan. and Feb. tends to be a bit skewed due to the Lunar New Year effect when economic activity tends to be high compared to the rest of the year.

China Economic Indicators – GDP Growth, HSBC Markit PMI

Recent macroeconomic data out of China depicts positive trends. China’s economy rebounded to register a GDP growth of 7.9 percent in Q4 2012 from a year earlier, after decelerating for more than two years and above polled analysts’ estimates of 7.8 percent. For the full year 2012 China registered a GDP growth of 7.8 percent down from 9.3 percent growth in 2011. The Chinese economy has slowed for the last few years due to various factors but primarily due to slowdown of the global economy, which has curbed the demand for its products abroad. After the financial crisis, China’s GDP growth reached a peak of 12.1 percent in Q1 2010 as shown in Figure 1, fueled not only by easy money policy and massive stimulus package by the People’s Bank of China (PBC) but also due to rebuild and repair which was going on in the global economy after a recession. Being the world’s second-largest economy, China’s GDP numbers are widely monitored and followed in the investment community. China is also the center of a lot of estimation and speculation, and China’s GDP numbers moves the global equity and currency markets as well as commodity prices. Beijing had set a targeted growth rate of 7.5 percent for 2012 and 2013, and the new incoming leadership for the next decade of Xi Jinping and Li Keqiang will try to ensure that future growth is in line with those set targets or exceed targets. Other data points, which are not widely followed but also used, include railway freight data and electricity consumption. Both of which have seen positive trends, as depicted in Figure 1. According to the new Premier Li Keqiang, both electricity consumption and railway freight are better indicators of growth than GDP data.



Figure 1. China GDP growth and other economic indicators
Source: Wall Street Journal[1]
HSBC Markit China Manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index TM (PMITM) is another critical indicator which the global investing community looks forward to at the beginning of every month for the prior month’s manufacturing activity in China. In January 2013, the HSBC Markit China PMI index recorded a value of 52.3, up from 51.5 in December 2012 as shown in Figure 2, signaling robust growth in the manufacturing sector and support the boost in the GDP growth. Value above 50 indicates continued strength or expansion in the manufacturing sector, and a value below 50 indicates contraction or recessionary conditions. January marked the third month of growth in the China manufacturing sector, including production and new export orders. The average reading for Q4 2012 was 50.5. That is the strongest since 2011 and above the low average reading of 48.3 from Q3 2012, marking the turnaround for both the PMI as well as the closely correlated GDP growth, which is clearly evident from the plot of PMI and Gross Domestic Product in Figure 2. This plot also depicts the sharp contraction in the PMI measure as well as the GDP growth around Q1 of 2009 due to the financial crisis of 2008-2009.
 

Figure 2. HSBC China Manufacturing PMI and PMI versus GDP plotted against time
Source: Markit [2],[3]

Commodity Prices – Iron Ore, Copper and Crude Oil

China’s industrial sector and its robust growth are main contributors of demand for commodities including iron ore, copper and crude oil, of which China is the biggest consumer. China demand drives the global prices of metals including copper, steel and commodities like iron ore and coal. This demand in commodities is not only driven by the country’s growing housing sector but also numerous infrastructure projects that the government has undertaken since the crisis of 2008-2009. China sources its commodities mostly from mining and materials rich Australia and Brazil, where most of the giant global miners, like BHP Billiton, Rio Tinto, Xstrata and Vale SA, are based. Prices for these commodities and metals have rebounded in the last few months, signaling the rebound currently going through the Chinese economy.
The iron and steel industry in China is one of the most important and basic industries, and it plays a critical role not only in the country’s economic development but also globally. The growth of the iron and steel industry has kept pace with the rapid industrialization and urbanization in China that led to the development of the economy. Domestic steel consumption, after reaching a peak of 24.6 percent growth, has since come down to around 9 percent annual growth for the last two years due to slowdown in steel-consuming businesses, such as real estate, automobiles, machinery, and household appliances. Demand for steel has fallen for the last few years due to slowdown not only in the domestic economy but also in the global economy worldwide, which has dented demand for Chinese products in the foreign markets.
Iron ore prices are a key indicator of the Chinese domestic demand for steel and its economic condition. Iron ore prices (benchmark iron ore with 62 percent iron content) have jumped 25 percent in December and around 3 percent in January and have come a long way up from the $100 level reached last year. Steel prices in China have stayed high amidst hopes that construction and manufacturing will pick up after the Chinese New Year holiday and is acting as a floor below the iron-ore prices. China is also the biggest consumer of steel-reinforcement bar (rebar) and the rebar futures contract for delivery in May 2013 was priced recently at 4144 yuan ($665), [4] which is its highest level since June 2012.

China accounts for 40 percent of global copper demand and is the biggest global consumer of copper. Copper prices were hit hard middle of last year due to economic concerns about a potential hard landing, which China has been able to avoid so far. Copper prices shown in Figure 3 for COMEX Copper Futures, May 2013, have been climbing fueled by the demand, restocking and recovering economic conditions from China, based on positive economic data for the last few months.
Figure 3. COMEX Copper (Cu) Futures (May 2013) Price
China is the world’s second largest global oil consumer and crude oil is the largest component of its import. China’s crude-oil imports for 2012 recorded a growth of 6.8 percent, which was better than 6.1 percent of 2011 but lower than 2010 before a slowdown in the domestic economy ensued. With an expanding economy fueled by urbanization and more and more people moving up in their socio-economic status the demand for imported crude oil will continue to rise and provide a good barometer to the health of the overall Chinese economy.

China Retail Sales

With the global slowdown affecting major economies like the European Union (EU) and United States, China needs to be more self-dependent on its increasing middle-class population, migrating to bigger cities and spending more to stimulate the economy forward through internal consumption. Household consumption drives 70 percent of GDP in the United States whereas in China it is around 35 percent. One large part of that percentage is retail sales, one of China’s key growth drivers. Retail sales hit 15.2 percent in Dec 2012 compared to the same month in the previous year as reported by the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) of China and depicted in Figure 4. NBS has started publishing the month-on-month growth data from 2011 onwards, also represented in Figure 4. Trends from both YoY and MoM retail sales shows that consumers and businesses are more confident in their spending habits, which is critical to sustaining positive economic development.


Figure 4. China Retail Sales (MoM, YoY)
Source: www.tradingeconomics.com[5]

China Trade – Exports, Imports & Trade Surplus

The monthly export data from China is not only a gauge of the Chinese domestic economy but also of the global economic demand and growth. China is the world’s largest exporter having overtaken second-place Germany in 2009. Low cost of labor and land for years have helped China’s exporters keep the prices of their products down as compared to the rest of the world aided by an undervalued yuan (RMB). Strong export numbers is positive both for the domestic markets as well as for the global equities markets, as analysts, economists and others watch the numbers closely to monitor the growth story in China as well as for the rest of the world. Similarly strong import numbers signal big demand for commodities like iron ore, copper, and oil, of which China is their biggest importer. Also, there are often big price movements based on these numbers.
Exports climbed 25 percent in January 2013 after a 14.1 percent rise in December 2012, while imports rose 28.8 percent in January 2013 ahead of the 6 percent increase from December 2012 and both were better than the estimates. The trade surplus was slightly lower at $29.2 billion in January 2013, from $31.6 billion in December and $19.6 billion in November.[6] The data could be impacted by seasonal distortion due to the Chinese Lunar New Year, which falls this year in February as compared to January last year. Nonetheless, it shows robust growth and a sustainable economic momentum. Looking deeper into the recent exports data, trends like exports to U.S. and the E.U. shows signs of improvement and positive growth which is healthy for the Chinese economy.

Figure 5. China Trade Surplus/Deficit data for FY 2012

Consumer Price Index (CPI) – Measure of Inflation

After falling for close to a year the Consumer Price Index, a key measure of inflation climbed back again in December by 2.5 percent YoY, as shown in Figure 6 for Consumer Prices month-on-month and year-on-year comparisons and in the China Inflation Rate graph as well, which has the year-on-year change. Food is a key part of the CPI basket and food prices went up by 4.2 percent and were the biggest contributor while non-food prices went up by only 1.7 percent. Higher consumer prices lowers the purchasing power of households, and as the rising middle class families spent a lot of their income earnings on food, higher food prices can be a cause of social unrest and is closely monitored by the central think-tank in Beijing. Post financial crisis in middle of 2011 the inflation levels went up (6-6.5 percent, food inflation of ~15 percent), close to the levels of 2007 of double-digit food inflation shown in Figure 7. Unlike the European Central Bank (ECB), which closely monitors the inflation rate (2 percent target), or the Federal Reserve Bank, the People’s Bank of China does not have a formal inflation target, although Premier Wen Jiabao had targeted inflation rates of 3.5% percent for 2013. The government had to increase the interest rates in the past to fight the inflation, which has since cooled to manageable levels. Increase in inflation also arrest economic development and negatively affects commodity prices. Hence, there is a keen eye always on China inflation numbers to make sure that the growth story is not derailed by inflationary conditions and so far it has held pretty well.


Figure 6. Consumer Price Index – Month-On-Month and Year-On-Year comparisons


Figure 7. China Consumer Price Index (CPI) & Food Prices comparison
     Source: The Wall Street Journal [8]

China Monetary and Economic Policy Analysis

The People’s Bank of China (PBC) is the central bank, and similar to United States’ Federal Reserve Bank (‘Fed’) it conducts various open market operations to maintain and boost liquidity in the banking system. It also promotes credit and lending to small businesses, farmers and for agricultural purposes in the rural areas, government projects and various other reasons. One such open market operation is the cut in the reserve requirement ratio (called the ‘RRR’) to boost liquidity so that easy lending can occur and the PBC has done that few times during 2012, following a 0.5 percent cut in December 2011. It needs to be noted that a raise in the RRR would produce an opposite effect by absorbing the liquidity from the system. The first RRR cut last year of 0.5 percent was in February 2012 followed by another 0.5 percent cut in May 2012 to ensure adequate liquidity in the system. Another operation that PBC undertook was to cut the benchmark deposit and lending rates successively on June 8 and July 6, 2012.[9] Upon completion of this operation, the one-year benchmark deposit rate was lowered to 3.00 percent and the one-year lending rate was lowered to 6.00 percent. Additionally, PBC adjusted the floating bands of deposit and lending rates. The upper ceiling of deposit rate was raised and the floor of the lending rate was lowered to promote borrowing by lowering the cost of borrowing for companies.
Chinese government announced a massive stimulus package of 1 trillion yuan ($156 billion) on Sep. 7, 2012, after the economy cooled to around 7.6 percent GDP growth for Q2 2012. The stimulus package consists of plans to build highways, waterways, urban rail and subway projects, and waste-water treatment plants to stimulate growth and prevent a halt in the economic expansion. Although this package is much smaller than the 4 trillion yuan ($631 billion) which was injected into the economy between 2009 and 2010, both the infrastructure spending stimulus and the open market operations point to the fact that PBC is ready to take action whenever necessary to promote and inject liquidity in the system, thereby boosting the overall domestic economy.

China Equity Market Analysis

A comparison of the Shanghai Stock Exchange Composite Index [Bloomberg Index: SHCOMP, Figure 8] (from mainland China) and Hang Seng Index [Bloomberg Index: HSI, Figure 9] (from Hong Kong), both of which are good representative of the China equity markets, is presented along with their short term (20-day), medium term (50-day) and long term (100-day) simple moving averages (MA) for the last year. Both the charts paint a bullish picture of the current state of the Chinese stock markets. The SHCOMP index has been moving gradually up from the lows of November end. All retracements until now for this index have bounced from the short term 20-day moving average, which is very bullish. Similarly the HSI index has been moving up steadily from early June and all retracements until now have bounced from the 50-day moving average, which is also overall very bullish. Looking at the longer term (five years) trends in the Chinese equity markets, it can be seen that the market descent that began around August 2009 [Bloomberg Index: SHCOMP, Figure 10] and ended around end of November 2012 may have played out and the markets are ready to move up and in the process of doing that currently. This is also positively confirmed from the long term (five years) chart of the closely related HSI index [Bloomberg Index: HSI, Figure 11].


Figure 8. Shanghai Stock Exchange Composite Index performance chart for 1yr. – 20 day SMA – 50 day SMA – 100 day SMA
Figure 9. Hang Seng Index performance chart for 1yr.  – 20 day SMA – 50 day SMA – 100 day SMA
Figure 10. Shanghai Stock Exchange Composite Index performance chart for 5 yr
Figure 11. Hang Seng Index performance chart for 5 yr

Conclusion

The macroeconomic data from the month of January and initial data from February continues to be impressive pointing to the fact that there are further gains stored in the Chinese equity markets ahead in 2013. After an almost 43 percent correction in the Shanghai Stock Exchange Composite Index (Bloomberg Index: SHCOMP) from August 2009 to November 2012, Chinese financial markets have shot back up around 23 percent from December 2012 to mid-February and continue to be one of the global equity market leaders in 2013. According to the words of Jim O’Neill, from Goldman Sachs Asset Management (GSAM), who continues to be optimistic on China even after a decade when he first published his views on the BRIC economies, “While so many people still always seem to be looking for the worse in China, and so many believe that you can’t make money out of the story even if the economy continues to steam along, I find it amongst the more stable things to think about.” [10]
On Sep. 17, 2012, China released its 12th five-year plan for financial sector development and reform. This plan is going to herald a new phase in the growth of China with the country moving from export and investment led growth to more of an internal consumption-based growth driven by the 1.3 billion Chinese consumers. As global growth across most of the major economies slows, China is focusing more inwards to fuel its next phase of growth. Premier Wen Jiabao in his final report to the congress said, “We should unswervingly take expanding domestic demand as our long-term strategy for domestic development,”[11] stressing the importance of China to drive its growth based on the demand from its domestic consumption. The 12th five-year plan with its emphasis in boosting employment, raising wages and promoting more spending – as compared to saving – will help to continue support the growth trajectory. This is also supported by the fact that there is a huge migration going on in China, with people moving from rural to urban areas with income in urban areas more than three times that of rural areas.       
Downside risks still exist in the Chinese economy, with inflation alone having the potential to stall the growth. Inflation has been identified as one of the top 10 major issues that must to be addressed in the years ahead as part of the 12th five-year plan. If inflation starts picking up beyond a threshold, China needs to enact more monetary tightening policies and higher interest rates to fight the inflation. Rising wages may also have some effect. Although rising wages is seen beneficial in terms of driving more internal consumption based growth, but in the global markets it dampens the demand for Chinese manufactured goods. The hukou – which is China’s system of resident permits – is a big obstacle to raising incomes and driving consumption. Some of the cities are trying different measures to overhaul this old system so that approximately 200 million rural migrant workers can settle in the city they work and have access to social benefits, including education in public schools for their children.
Property prices in China have also been a major cause of headache amongst many, including China’s leadership. After staying flat for a while, property prices in major Chinese cities have started climbing again. Property prices in Shanghai were up 41 percent from a year earlier for the first two months of this year, according to the data from real-estate agency Soufun.[12]  China’s leadership has tried different tightening measures in the past to ensure less participation of speculators in its bubbly property market, but at the same time ensuring affordability for the middle class. In its latest attempt policy makers have proposed implementation of a 20 percent capital gains tax on profits from sales of homes. Additionally it is planning to implement measures including increasing down payment requirement and higher mortgage rates by banks that would make it difficult for second-home buyers to participate and speculate in the real estate market. All of these have the potential to dampen the domestic growth scenario.       
Although we are far from the double-digit annual growth that was normal in the last couple of decades, it is evident that the new regime in China would not allow the hard landing (GDP growth below 5 percent), which many in the world have feared. The new normal growth will be around the 7-8 percent range to avoid a slowdown or hard landing and China is going to make sure through their various economic and monetary policies that it stays around that level with the country moving towards more consumption led growth as opposed to previously investment led growth.

Notes



[1] Tom Orlik, “Charting China’s Economy: The Fourth Quarter”, The Wall Street Journal, January 18, 2013.
[2] HSBC China Manufacturing PMI, February 1, 2013: http://www.markiteconomics.com/MarkitFiles/Pages/ViewPressRelease.aspx?ID=10652 (accessed March 31, 2013)
[3] Manufacturing PMI starts 2013 on two-year high, January 24, 2013: http://www.markit.com
[4] “Rebar Climbs to Seven-Month High as China Manufacturing Expands,” January 31, 2013: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-02-01/rebar-climbs-to-seven-month-high-as-china-manufacturing-expands.html (accessed March 31, 2013)
[5] China Retail Sales. http://www.tradingeconomics.com/ (accessed March 31, 2013)
[6] Aaron Back, “China Exports Elevates Trade Surplus”, The Wall Street Journal, January 10, 2013.
[7] National Bureau of Statistics of China: www.stats.gov.cn/english (accessed March 31, 2013)
[8] Tom Orlik, “Charting China’s Economy,” The Wall Street Journal, January 18, 2013.
[9] China Monetary Policy Report, Quarter Two: http://www.pbc.gov.cn/publish/english/3667/index.html , 10 (accessed March 31, 2013)
[10] Goldman Sachs Asset Management (GSAM), “Viewpoints from Chairman Jim O’Neill”, February 11, 2013: http://www.goldmansachs.com/gsam/worldwide/index.html (accessed March 31, 2013)
[11] Tom Orlik, Bob Davis and Esther Fung, “China Moves to Temper Growth – Property Bubble Is a Key Concern,” The Wall Street Journal, March 5, 2013
[12] Ibid.

Tuesday, July 9, 2013

Best Picks List 2013: Oasis Petroleum (NYSE: OAS) - A Bakken Shale Revolution

Introduction

After doing nothing much for the entire 2012 (only +4.2%), Oasis Petroleum (NYSE: OAS) is up over +32% YTD (till 07/09/2013) in 2013. This is a name which I have closely followed for the last couple of years and I am quite bullish on the prospects for this company in the long-term. This is also a holding in my Best Picks 2013 Model Portfolio which I am tracking from 01/01/2013 for 2013. I normally add to my position when there is a pullback to any of my preferred technical levels in an up-trend market. Additionally I trim my positions based on technical levels (e.g. high RSI) or when there is excess exuberance in the markets.

Region

OAS primarily operates as an Exploration and Production (E&P) company in the Williston Basin of Montana and North Dakota in the Bakken and Three Forks formation. Over the course of last few years production growth has increased by leaps and bounds in this region as more and more places are discovered from where shale oil can be drilled with ease using modern day hydraulic-fracturing techniques.

Financials & Growth Trajectory - Q1 2013 Summary Results

Q1 ended March 2013 oil production was 2482 MBbls compared to 1474 MBbls for Q1 ended March 2012, i.e. a growth of 68.4%. In terms of Oil equivalents the numbers were 2714 MBoe at the end of Q1 March 2013 compared to 1605 MBoe at the end of Q1 March 2012, i.e. a growth of 69.1%.

Oil related revenues grew to $231,675 (thousands) at the end of Q1 2013 compared to 131,376 at the end of Q1 2012, i.e. a growth of 76%. Average daily production increased to 30,153 Boe (barrels of oil equivalent) per day at the end of Q1 2013 from 17,633 Boe per day at the end of Q1 2012, i.e. a growth of  71%. Average oil sale prices increased to $93.33 per Bbl (without derivatives) in Q1 2013 from $88.10 per Bbl in Q1 2012, i.e. higher by 6% and contributes towards higher realized oil related revenues.

This amazing high growth numbers across all different data, points to the fact that OAS is still growing and at a rapid pace.

Financials & Growth Trajectory - FY 2012 Summary Results


Merger & Acquisition Opportunity

Market capitalization of OAS is around $3.9B, with around $1.2B in long-term debt. This puts OAS into a sweet-spot where any of the US based oil and gas giants [e.g. Anadarko Petroleum (APC), Apache Corp (APA), etc.] without a presence in the Williston Basin can easily gobble up OAS. At the same time OAS can be a target for any of the Canadian oil and gas company or for example if any of the Chinese or Korean oil and gas companies like to expand their presence in US for their domestic needs. There has been M&A by Chinese and Korean companies buying up US based and Canada based E&P companies assets. 
Bakken shale has attracted a lot of attention because of the huge shale oil contents of the region. Couple of previous M&A of companies in the region included Brigham Exploration Company (NASDAQ: BEXP) which was acquired by Statoil of Norway. Similarly GeoResources Inc. (NASDAQ: GEOI) was acquired by Halcon Resources. 

Downside Risks

Following are some of the downside risks to this high octane growth story:
  • Slowdown of global economy which causes WTI (West Texas Intermediate - US crude oil benchmark) crude prices to fall thus affecting revenue realized for OAS. 
  • Assumption and reliance on the net proved and developed reserves estimates data provided by the independent reserve engineers. 
  • OAS can successfully and economically extract the oil from the prepared and drilled wells

Thursday, June 27, 2013

Shale Revolution in the United States

This article is to be published by the Boston College Finance Magazine - 2013 Edition

by Debashis Das (MSF-2014) , Tracy To (MSF-2014)

Introduction

The United States is sitting on a large amount of oil and natural gas reserves. These reserves have been further increased by the newly-discovered Bakken Shale and the Utica Shale formations. Coupled with the new technology of horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing (also known as ‘fracking’), this opens up new potential for companies in this this industry and for the country. The supply glut has helped push natural gas prices down which is beneficial for a host of secondary industries, including electric power generation utilities, chemical companies, steel companies, etc. The shale revolution in the U.S. is creating many jobs in places like North Dakota, where due to the Bakken Shale formation, the unemployment rate is lower than average for the rest of the country. This article looks at the different shale regions, how natural gas is extracted from the shale formations, what drives the price of natural gas, i.e. the different aspects of supply and demand and also the environmental aspects of horizontal drilling. 

US Shale Regions

The major oil and gas shale formations in the continental US includes: Bakken Shale, Barnett Shale, Eagle Ford Shale, Haynesville Shale, Marcellus Shale, and the Utica Shale formations. The Bakken Shale formation, located in Montana and North Dakota, is estimated to hold 4.3 billion barrels of oil and is the largest oil find in U.S. history. The estimates may grow as more companies drill and find oil in that region. The formation ranges in depth from 4500 – 7500 feet with an average thickness of 22 feet. In 2009 Bakken Shale in North Dakota produced 80 million barrels of oil making it the fourth largest oil producing state after Texas, California and Alaska.
In Texas, Barnett Shale, the nation’s most developed shale gas play, is estimated to hold 43.4 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) of natural gas and has already produced more than 4.8 Tcf. It stretches across 6500 square miles and its natural gas reserves are enough to power all of Texas’s homes for almost 200 years. Also in Texas, the Eagle Ford Shale formation which did not become productive until 2008 has an estimated 21 Tcf of natural gas and 3.35 billion barrels of oil reserves. This shale formation ranges in depth from 5700 to around 10,200 feet and covers around 3000 square miles.
Surpassing the Barnett Shale formation, the Haynesville Shale gas formation located in western Louisiana, east Texas, and south-western Arkansas has an estimated 74.7 Tcf of shale gas reserves and ranges between 10,500 and 13,500 feet in depth. The area encompasses more than 9000 square miles, is about 200 to 300 feet thick and is considered to be the second largest natural gas shale formation in the United States.
The Marcellus shale formation, stretching across 5 States (New York, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio and Maryland), is estimated to contain 410 Tcf of shale gas. The total area is around 95,000 square miles and the depth is from 4000 to 8000 feet. The thick organic-rich shale intervals are concentrated in the northeastern Pennsylvania, coincident with where the highest leasing activities are.[1] The Utica Shale formation, a relatively new shale discovery is located few thousand feet below the Marcellus shale. Utica Shale, believed to be larger and thicker than Marcellus based on the early testing results, is still under evaluation. Much of the exploration in the Utica Shale formation is occurring in eastern Ohio where this shale formation is closest to the ground. It is estimated to hold more than 15 Tcf of natural gas and 5.5 billion barrels of oil as per Ohio Geological Survey.

Shale Gas – Extraction Process

 Today, hydraulic fracturing is used extensively for shale oil and gas extraction and use a combination of water, oil, sand, and chemicals as a fluid through concentric steel tubes to create fractures in the rock. The fluids most commonly used in the hydraulic fracturing process are water, sand and chemical additives, which include sodium chloride (table salt), ethylene glycol (present in household cleaners), borate salts (used in cosmetics), sodium/potassium carbonate (used in detergent), guar gum (used in ice-cream) and isopropanol (used in deodorant).[2] The hydraulic fracturing fluid is injected into the well at very high pressure to open cracks into the shale rocks. The sand remains in the fractures, holding the fissures open and allowing the oil and gas to flow into the well, along with the fluids. Figure 1 illustrates the process of hydraulic fracturing or ‘fracking’.[3] With hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling, much shale resource once considered inaccessible has becomes available. Additionally horizontal drilling has drastically reduced the footprints the exploration and production (E&P) company’s leave on the surface with the drilling pad site is much reduced.
Natural gas (primarily methane) extracted from a well has liquefiable hydrocarbons (e.g. propane, butane, etc.) as well as other contaminant gases (carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, etc.) and is referred to as ‘wet natural gas’. Natural gas from which these components of liquefiable components and contaminants are removed is referred to as ‘dry natural gas’. This separation is done at a natural gas processing plant close to where the gas is extracted. This dry natural gas is consumer grade and sent through pipelines for distribution to consumers or for liquefaction for export purposes.
Figure 1. Hydraulic Fracturing Process

Natural Gas – Supply, Demand & Price Stability

Natural gas prices hit a bottom of around $1.90/MMBtu (per million British thermal units) in April 2012 from a high of around $14/MMBtu during the commodities boom of 2007 – 2008. There are a few reasons for this price fluctuation including the state of the economy, supply and demand scenario, variations in weather patterns in winter and summer, imports, severe weather conditions (e.g. hurricanes which are normal and hits the Gulf coast, often leads to shutdown of production facilities), storage capacity, alternate fuel usage and industrial and consumer demands.
A common measure of the long-term viability of U.S. domestic crude oil and natural gas is the remaining technically recoverable resource, also called remaining TRR. Estimates of TRR are often not certain, specifically for the new sites where few wells have been drilled. The remaining TRR consists of ‘proved reserves’ and ‘unproved resources.’ Proved reserves of crude oil and natural gas are the estimated volumes which are expected to be produced with certainty under existing economic and operating conditions. Unproved resources are additional volumes expected to be produced without consideration of economics or operating condition. As wells are drilled, unproved resources become proved reserves and ultimately contribute to the production figures. Estimates of unproved resources can change significantly as more is learned about the fields where drilling continues. The unproved reserved has dropped to 482 Tcf in the Annual Energy Outlook 2012 report (as of 1/1/2010) from 827 Tcf as of 1/1/2009.[4] Nevertheless, the proved reserves of U.S. wet natural gas at December 31, 2010 increased to 318 Tcf from 284 Tcf at December 31, 2009, a 11.9 % increase.[5] The Energy Information Administration (EIA) expects that natural gas consumption in the U.S. will average around 70 Bcf/d in both 2013 and 2014. Closer to average temperatures in 2013 and similar forecasts for 2014 (compared to record-warm temperatures in 2012) have led to higher than average usage of natural gas for commercial and residential heating.
U.S. Dry Natural Gas Production totaled 24.05 Tcf following 22.9 Tcf in 2011,[6] an increase of 5.0% in 2012, 7.8% in 2011, 3.4% in 2010 and 2.3% in 2009 year-on-year as shown in Figure 2. Figure 2 also shows the record production levels achieved in 2011 and in 2012 surpassing the previous record production levels from the early 1970’s. The increase in production is attributed to various factors, including more cost-efficient drilling techniques such as horizontal drilling, which have resulted in an increased output from the shale formations. In the long run increase in supply will push prices down and will deter exploration and production companies to increase their drilling acreage. This will reduce the gas output thereby decreasing production and hence maintain the equilibrium between supply and demand. 

Figure 2. U.S. Dry Natural Gas Production historical data (1930 – 2013)
It is surprising, but true that although U.S. is awash with natural gas through its various shale formations, the country still imports natural gas for its domestic usage through pipelines primarily from Canada and Mexico and also as LNG (liquefied natural gas) from Africa, the Caribbean, and the Middle-East. Imports increased from the mid-80s to around 2007. Since that time, imports have decreased due to various factors, including a weak economy, high storage levels, and increasing production here in the U.S as shown in Figure 3.[7]
Economic growth can fuel consumption of natural gas and hence positively affect the demand and support higher prices. Higher demand exists from industrial and commercial sectors during times of strength in the economy. Steel plants use natural gas as their plant fuel and similarly, companies in the chemical sector [e.g. Dow Chemical (NYSE:DOW) or Lyondell Basell (NYSE:LYB)] and fertilizer companies use natural gas as their raw feedstock. Economic downturns, as well as the cyclical nature of these industries, can have a negative effect on demand.

Figure 3. U.S. Natural Gas Imports historical data (1970 – 2013)
Natural gas in underground storage fields also plays a critical role in the supply and demand equation and helps maintain the price equilibrium. During sudden demand spike situations, either due to weather conditions (hot or cold) or pipeline outage issues, reserves are released to meet the additional needs in the market and thus support price stability. Natural gas levels in storage typically increase from April – October and decrease during the heating season from November – March. This ‘saw-tooth’ pattern repeats every year and is shown in Figure 4.[8]
Prices of other alternative fuels also have an effect on natural gas prices specifically that of crude oil and coal. Between the EPA coming down hard on the usage of coal and strict emission standards in power plants, there has been a push to move into the cleaner, natural-gas-based electricity generation. This trend has been helped by lower natural gas prices and higher supply, thus creating demand.

Figure 4. Lower 48 states Natural gas Working Underground Storage historical data (1994 – 2013)
Higher crude oil prices will tend to move some of the demand over to natural gas. An example of this is 18 wheeler trucks, which could run on natural gas and not only save on diesel fuel costs as compared to the cheap natural gas, but also pollute the atmosphere less. T. Boone Pickens (hedge fund investor) has been pushing for government subsidies in the trucking sector for years but this has yet to be passed, although it is gaining support from the president and politicians from both parties. Clean Energy Fuels Corp (NASDAQ: CLNE), which is majority owned by T. Boone Pickens, has been installing natural gas stations for refueling purposes. More and more companies like United Parcel Service, Inc. (NYSE:UPS) and others have started adopting natural gas based vehicles, although the number is not large currently.  

Export & Import Landscape

Cheniere Energy (NYSE: LNG) is the first company to get approval from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (‘FERC’) for the construction and operation of a facility which would liquefy and export domestically produced natural gas from the Sabine Pass LNG (owned 100% by Cheniere) terminal located in Louisiana. The Sabine Pass terminal has regasification and send-out capacity of 4.0 billion cubic feet per day (bcf/d) and storage capacity of 16.9 billion cubic feet equivalent. This approval would help to add even more capacity to the current Sabine Pass LNG terminal. Cheniere has also entered into a long-term contract for sale of LNG on the order of 16.0 mtpa (million tons per annum) to the following: BG Gulf Coast LNG (5.5 mtpa), Gas Natural Fenosa (3.5 mtpa), Korea Gas Corp (3.5 mtpa) and GAIL India Ltd. (3.5 mtpa).[9] Earlier in 2012, Cheniere entered into a contract with Blackstone Capital Partners, an affiliate of the popular private equity firm The Blackstone Group, whereby Blackstone Capital Partners agreed to fund the equity needed for the expansion of the Sabine Pass LNG terminal project, highlighting the importance of this project to the investment community. Net imports (imports minus exports) have been falling and are at its lowest level since 1992 as shown in Figure 5,[10] which is good for the overall U.S. economy as it becomes less dependent on foreign reserves of natural gas.

Figure 5. U.S. annual average natural gas net imports (1973 – 2011)

Environmental Aspects of Shale Gas Drilling

Although natural gas is a relatively clean energy which, in use, releases fewer emissions than does coal or oil, its production process can create environmental impact if proper precautions are not employed. Among all, the potential of water impact is the most concerned. As the hydraulic fracturing process uses large volumes of water, which later results in waste water, there can be impacts on drinking water resources and aquatic ecosystems. As mentioned earlier, hydraulic fracturing fluids consist of water, oil, sand, and chemicals. In case of spills or leaks from the storage on site where the fluid is placed before injection, or through the injection well, surface water and underground aquifers may be contaminated on contact with the fluids. Once the fracturing is completed, the hydraulic fracturing waste water is withdrawn and returned to the surface. In addition to the fracturing fluid, the flow back fluid can contain natural gas, high levels of total dissolved solids (chemicals), metals, and naturally occurring radioactive materials.[11] Typically, this waste water is recycled for use in fracturing fluid, transported to treatment facilities, or disposed of by injection into deep wells. The environment impact would be severe should the waste water be improperly handled and discharged to surface soil or water during storage for reuse, transportation to treatment plants or disposal into wells.  Besides, historical cases suggest that waste water injection into deep wells induces earthquakes, and that there is a correlation between the magnitude of the largest earthquake and the total volume of waste water injection.
While FracFocus, the national hydraulic fracturing chemical registry, discloses chemicals that are used in hydraulic fracturing, and also provides public access to the official state chemical disclosure for 10 states,[12] a report highlights that energy companies didn’t report thousands of their oil and natural gas wells as having been hydraulically fractured on FracFocus.org.”[13]Air quality is also impacted near natural gas production areas. Emission of a high volume of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) and methane are associated with the waste water returning to the surface.

Conclusion

Shale oil and gas production in U.S. has risen to record levels over the last few years due to improvements in drilling technology. Due to the abundance in supply from the existing and the recently discovered shale formations, improvement in drilling techniques and technologies, stalled economic activity and various other reasons including seasonal change in demands, prices have fallen drastically from their 2007-2008 highs, although lately it has risen back up from the lows of April 2012 when the price fell below $2/MMBtu. Lower natural gas prices are a boon for some of the industries, including chemical, steel, fertilizer and power generation utility companies. Exploration and Production companies drilling for natural gas, need to ensure proper precaution when horizontal drilling for oil and gas in the shale regions, to avoid water contamination. The current shale reserve estimates are good enough to support the needs of the U.S. for many years to come and is prompting companies to export natural gas globally to other places where because of less supply it demands higher prices, e.g. China, Japan and other places in Asia. Politicians in this country should take a closer look and take necessary steps to ensure that the U.S. can reap the full benefits of what exists in abundance naturally, including passing laws to promote liquefied natural gas export and opening up areas where natural gas can be used easily. This would help the U.S. to boost employment thereby reducing unemployment rate as companies drill more natural gas which finds usage in different industries within this country and outside globally as well.

 Notes



[1] Marcellus Shale – Appalachian Basin Natural Gas Play: http://geology.com/articles/marcellus-shale.shtml (accessed April 06, 2013)
[2] Understanding Fracturing Fluid: http://www.energyfromshale.org/hydraulic-fracturing/hydraulic-fracturing-fluid (accessed March 31, 2013)
[3] What Is Hydraulic Fracturing?: http://www.propublica.org/special/hydraulic-fracturing-national (accessed March 31, 2013)
[4] U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), Annual Energy Outlook 2012: http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/pdf/0383(2012).pdf , 57 (accessed March 31, 2013)
[5] U.S. Crude Oil, Natural Gas, and NG Liquids Proved Reserves: http://www.eia.gov/naturalgas/crudeoilreserves/index.cfm (accessed March 31, 2013)
[6] U.S. Dry Natural Gas Production data: http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/hist/n9070us2A.htm (accessed March 31, 2013)
[7] U.S. Natural Gas Imports: http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/hist/n9100us2a.htm (accessed March 31, 2013)
[8] Lower 48 States Natural Gas Working Underground Storage: http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/hist/nw_epg0_sao_r48_bcfw.htm (accessed March 31, 2013)
[9] FERC Approves the Sabine Pass Liquefaction Project: http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=101667&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1683624&highlight= (accessed March 31, 2013)
[10]U.S. natural gas net imports at lowest levels since 1992:  http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=5410 (accessed March 31, 2013)
[11] Natural Gas Extraction – Hydraulic Fracturing: http://www2.epa.gov/hydraulicfracturing#wastewater (accessed April 06, 2013)
[12] Frac Focus Chemical Disclosure Registry: http://fracfocus.org/welcome
[13] Benjamin Haas, Jim Polson, Phil Kuntz & Ben Elgin, “Fracking Hazards Obscured in Failure to Disclose Wells”, August 14, 2012: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-08-14/fracking-hazards-obscured-in-failure-to-disclose-wells.html (accessed April 06, 2013)